General Practice Airways Group International Primary Care Respiratory Group General Practice Airways Group International Primary Care Respiratory Group
Home
Articles in Press
Current Issue
All Issues
Alerts
Most popular articles
Editorial Board
Advertising
Search Tools

Volume 16 Issue 3 June 2007



Do people self-reporting information about chronic respiratory disease have corroborative evidence in their general practice medical records? A study of intermethod reliability • Original Research

Pages 162-168

*Lisa Iversena, Philip C Hannaforda, David J Goddenb, David Pricea

a Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK

b Centre for Rural Health, The Greenhouse, Beechwood Business Park, Inverness, IV2 3BL, UK

Received 17 October 2006 • Accepted 17 February 2007 • Online 21 May 2007


Abstract
AIMS: To use intermethod reliability to compare self-reported data about chronic respiratory disease and health service utilisation with data contained in general practice medical records. METHODS: Self-reported postal questionnaire information from a small cohort of an age-sex stratified sample of 2318 patients was compared with information contained in their medical records. The agreement between the two sources of information was assessed. RESULTS: The case notes of 115/135 individuals from eight general practices were examined. For self-reported chest injury or operation
(kappa, κ=-0.03), or chronic bronchitis (κ=0.10), agreement was poor. Agreement for self-reported pleurisy (κ=0.32), hay fever or rhinitis (κ=0.40), or eczema or dermatitis (κ=0.30) was fair; for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or emphysema (κ=0.56), or heart trouble (κ=0.54), agreement was moderate; for asthma (κ=0.78) or pneumonia (κ=0.62), agreement was good; and for pulmonary tuberculosis (κ=0.88), agreement was very good. The strength of agreement for information about health service utilisation for respiratory problems ranged from moderate to very good and was good for smoking status. CONCLUSIONS: Although based on small numbers, our results suggest good or very good agreement between self-reported data and general practice medical records for the absence or presence of some respiratory conditions and some types of respiratory-related health care utilisation. Depending on the research question being examined self-reported information may be appropriate.

Keywords
agreement, chronic respiratory disease, intermethod reliability, medical records, postal questionnaire, self-report

View full text as PDF document

Right click on this DOI link and copy link to cite this article (What is a DOI link?)


* Corresponding author. Lisa Iversen Tel: +44 (0)1224 554226 Fax: +44 (0)1224 550683 Email: l.iversen@abdn.ac.uk
Website developed and maintained by danzigdesigns.com