International Primary Care Respiratory Group Primary Care Respiratory Society UK Primary Care Respiratory Society UK Primary Care Respiratory Society UK International Primary Care Respiratory Group Primary Care Respiratory Journal
Home
About the PCRJ
Aims, Scope and History
Editorial Board
Online first
Current Issue
Past Issues
Supplements
Translations
Most popular articles
Alerts
Subscribe
Instructions for Authors
Advertising
Disclaimer and Legal Notices
Contact Us

Volume 20 Issue 4 December 2011

Clinical Review

Reconsidering sex-based stereotypes of COPD

Pages 370-378
*Jill Ohara, Leonard Fromerb, James F Donohuec

a Section on Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Immunologic Diseases, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston Salem, NC, USA

b Department of Family Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA

c Division of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Received 7 October 2010 • Accepted 7 May 2011 • Online 16 September 2011


Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has historically been considered a disease of older, white, male smokers, as illustrated in Frank Netter’s classic images of the ‘pink puffer’ and ‘blue bloater’. However, women may be more susceptible to COPD than men, and the disease course may be reflective of that increased susceptibility. From a review of epidemiological data of COPD, we found differences in the way men and women present with COPD symptoms, a bias in the way COPD symptoms are treated in men and women, and differences in susceptibility to airway obstruction based on age, sex, and smoking history. These data show that classic stereotypes of COPD – including male predominance – should be abandoned, and that there are not two but multiple COPD phenotypes, which are characterised by differences between women and men in susceptibility, symptoms, and disease progression. These differences impact on physician perception. Although further research into this concept is needed, the differences we found should prompt, in the short term, changes in the way (and in whom) COPD is evaluated, diagnosed, and treated; in the long term, these differences should prompt research into the prognosis of COPD based on sex differences.

Cite as: Ohar J, Fromer L, Donohue JF. Reconsidering sex-based stereotypes of COPD. Prim Care Respir J 2011;20(4):370-378. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2011.00070

Keywords
COPD, phenotypes, female, male, sex, gender, stereotypes

* Corresponding author. Jill Ohar Tel: +1 336 716 8426 Fax: +1 336 716 7277 Email: johar@wfubmc.edu
PDF View full text as PDF document

CrossRef Right click on this DOI link and copy link/shortcut to cite this article (What is a DOI link?)

Export Export to bibliographic software or plain text

CiteULike Post to CiteULike

Email this article Email this article to friend/s or colleague/s

Cited by (from CrossRef) Cited by (from CrossRef)

•   Back to table of contents

Website developed and maintained by danzigdesigns.com